Read This On Our Main Website: https://psoec.com/the-devastation-of-the-whales-warns-us/?feed_id=1236&_unique_id=61b076a44bc4d
[ad_1]
By Patricia Burke
Whales warned us about radar years in the past
In 2014 the NRDC printed: "US Navy involved in new mass stranding of whales. "
Yesterday afternoon, whereas the US and different navies had been enjoying conflict video games off the coast, Cuvier's beaked whales had been stranded alongside the south coast of Crete. The native folks knew instantly what they had been coping with, as a result of yesterday's strandings had been simply the newest []of comparable disasters within the area that return 20 years. [ ] All indicators level to the Navy.
Cuvier's beaked whales are a notable species. They have the deepest recorded dives of any marine mammal, a few of which dive a staggering 3,000 toes beneath the floor earlier than gasping for air. They desire deep water and don't get stranded practically as typically as coastal species, and they don't get stranded in massive numbers, and they don't get stranded alive. But that is precisely what occurred.[] Three Cuvier's beaked whales got here ashore at one level [ ], two extra landed about 17 kilometers to the west and two extra appeared close by. They had been all alive after they had been stranded.
None of that is new to Greece. In 1996 and 1997 dozens of beaked whales of the identical species appeared [] In any case, Marines skilled within the space with high-powered sonar.[ ] According to the Smithsonian Institution and the International Whaling Commission, any recorded beaked whale stranding wherever on this planet with marine exercise, normally sonar, has occurred close by. [ ]
The US, Greek and Israeli navies had carried out a joint navy train [ ] together with coaching in submarine warfare, which requires using a strong navy sonar. [ ] Military sonar and marine mammals don't get alongside. - NRDC, 2014
For the EMF / RF coverage, the wheels are off the bus
Although the story obtained little consideration within the mainstream, the courtroom not too long ago dominated that The FCC's decision not to review its radio frequency exposure limits was arbitrary, arbitrary, and not evidence-based. Also an in depth investigation the environmental impact of non-ionizing radiation was not too long ago printed in Reviews on Environmental Health.
The "security" of wi-fi know-how and infrastructure is in limbo for each folks and the atmosphere.
Nevertheless, the business and its financial companions manifest a nationwide press to dominate heaven, earth and oceans. Including unjustified disguises Distant surgery, agricultural connectivity, the “digital divide” and a Race against China which turns into the Danger of war with China.
E-course: Vegetable energetics (advertisement)
The business is call for the introduction of wireless, together with 5G. The transfer to wi-fi really created, and never addressed, the digital divide. Wireless supplies surveillance beneath the guise of sustainability and connectivity, whereas ignoring safer, safer wired options.
Is it time for the environmental motion to acknowledge that claims that wi-fi and 5G will assist humanity address local weather change are harmful and deceptive pipe goals? Yes it's time
The good meter precedent
The wi-fi business, in partnership with utilities and regulators, makes deceptive, secure claims utilizing arguments like this (keep in mind low-tar and low-nicotine tobacco?):
- Determine any theoretical "security policy" (e.g. good meter)
- Expose everybody to publicity
- In response to break studies, take an arbitrary measurement and common publicity over time. Represent hysteria and psychological sickness. Claim that adjustments in physiology don't essentially have destructive well being results, and ask for proof of the sickness
- For instance, deny biology by reclassifying the ears as "appendages"
Treating the ear as an "appendage" will not be evidence-based, and "time averaging" is a fallacy that's armed towards harm and harm
See: In the Matter of Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency Exposure Limits and Policies ET Docket No. 13-84 Cindy Sage, MA and David O. Carpenter, Associate Editors, Bio-Initiative Reports 2007 https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7520957942.pdf (in relation to testing cell telephones):
What does time averaging imply? You have a boxer who's being overwhelmed up within the ring…. So you measure the moments he's hit and on a regular basis he's not hit and take the common. It appears like boxing is loads safer than it truly is, and that it's only hit a small share of the time, even when the boxer suffers in depth mind harm.
We do not use these equations to develop secure soccer helmets or automobile security, or the skilled affect of a jackhammer, so we should not use them to find out security for wi-fi exposures. The peak transmissions, not the averages, are the suitable measure.
Ignoring harm to land so as to conquer, exploit and management the oceans
People have accomplished a pitiful job of defending one another from dangerous publicity to noise, electromagnetic radiation, issues with community high quality and microwave radio frequencies (good grid, wi-fi consumption meters, Cell towers, Wind generators, different close by disruptive infrastructure).
Humans have additionally accomplished a pitiful job defending different species, akin to cows whose milk manufacturing has been compromised by issues with energy high quality and fundamental energy from the utility grid (which additionally bankrupts farmers). Dave Stetzer offered proof in help of the Michigan Attorney General's lawsuit towards Consumers Energy Company.
"I [ ] have carried out measurements on farms [ ] and recorded the responses of more than 6000 cows and some horses simultaneously with the electrical activity. The reactions are clearly correlated. "
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JRRMSqxcxc[/embed]
The business argues that behavioral and physiological adjustments don't essentially correlate with illness growth in cows and people. This has resulted in folks being tortured for being induced by microwave radio frequencies. When a complaint in reference to wi-fi exposures, the business takes a technical measurement and undoes the struggling and hurt.
The “guidelines” are inadequate.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/18/the-problems-with-smart-grids/
How would the tried and examined EMF / RF / 5G “science” offered with good tobacco meters be carried over to the marine atmosphere?
A. Develop a principle about how a lot radar and underwater noise the ocean and its folks can tolerate, measured in decibels, together with whales.
Let's cease proper right here.
Hearing in microwaves will not be tinnitus, and pulsed radiation doesn't work together with biology in the identical manner as different sources of noise
- Noise is a stress issue and an environmental pollutant.
- Microwave radio frequencies, which trigger "ringing in the ears," are a dangerous environmental pollutant and don't fall into the identical class as audible sound.
In 1960 Alan Frey found that "microwave radiation from radar (and other sources) can be" heard "by people.
"Hearing" was not accomplished by way of regular sound waves that had been perceived by the ear. It apparently occurred someplace within the mind itself when microwaves interacted with the mind cells that create tiny electrical fields. Frey proved [ ]the [] Animals may "hear" microwave radiation. In 1975, Frey reported that microwaves may trigger a "leak" within the barrier between the circulatory system and the mind. Breaking the blood-brain barrier [ ] signifies that micro organism, viruses and toxins can get into the mind from the blood. [ ] the atmosphere across the mind, which should be extraordinarily steady for nerve cells to perform correctly, might be disrupted in different harmful methods. Dr. Leif Salford, [ ] is presently probably the most energetic researcher persevering with Frey's pioneering work on the blood-brain barrier. - Mobile Phones Task Force
“Microwave hearing” exists exterior the vary of “audible” sound. Microwaves work together otherwise with physiology and can't be assessed with simply easy decibel measurements.
The declare that individuals can't hear microwaves as a result of the sound is exterior their listening to vary is totally false and creates excruciating situations in numerous human lives. It will likely be utterly fallacious for whales too.
On the opposite facet of the equation is low frequency noise.
- The concept of a “species threshold” for noise is incomplete and violates the rights of nature.
There is tolerance Variability between species.
Within a species there are particular person animals and fish with a sensory system on the higher finish or above the theoretical security restrict for "healthy" reactivity. Destroying the life of those organisms is presently irrelevant, together with these unable to sleep, which decimates immunity. Damage to people, bees and different residing organisms from RF is extensively ignored.
- Failure to have in mind cumulative, persistent and adjoining exposures makes security requirements irrelevant.
Sound within the ocean is rather more advanced than sound within the air
NOAA explained:
Water temperature and strain decide how far sound propagates within the ocean.
While sound strikes a lot quicker in water than in air, the gap that sound waves journey relies upon totally on the temperature and strain of the ocean. While the strain continues to extend with growing sea depth, the temperature of the ocean solely decreases as much as a sure level after which stays comparatively steady. These components have a curious impact on how (and the way far) sound waves journey.
In addition to the complexity of underwater sound, together with channel, the stranding of beaked whales twenty-one years in the past demonstrated the issue of resonance. Until we are able to responsibly shield the earth and the sky, now we have no proper to assault the ocean. (Sequel follows)
We can't prolong these cognitive errors to the seas.
[ad_2]
Read This On Our Main Website: https://psoec.com/the-devastation-of-the-whales-warns-us/?feed_id=1236&_unique_id=61b076a44bc4d
Comments
Post a Comment